Title DossierDocumentaire

Lost in the Arctic

Name: Lost in the Arctic
Genre: Documentaire
Released: 2023-08-25
Rating: 5.2

Documentaire

Sir John Franklin set off from England in 1845 with two ships and 129 men. Franklin's ships vanished without a trace. Now, a team of explorers attempt to solve the mystery by retracing Franklin's route.

Année

2023

Durée

IMDb

5.2

Regarder maintenant

Poster Feed

Casting

Renan Ozturk

Director

Tom Gross

Self - Franklin Historian

Jacob Keanik

Self - Expedition Guide

Casting

Renan Ozturk

Director

Tom Gross

Self - Franklin Historian

Jacob Keanik

Self - Expedition Guide

Renan Ozturk

Self - Nat Geo Filmmaker

Jimmy Pauloosie

Self - Inuit Cultural Guardian

Mark Synnott

Self - Nat Geo Writer

Ben Zartman

Self - 1st Mate

Rudy Lehfeldt-Ehlinger

Self - Photographer

Bande-annonce

Suggestions mises en avant

Envie de plus de divertissement ? Découvrez notre plateforme de jeux recommandée et notre destination de mini-dramas.

Jeux instantanés

Gamixo

Jouez à des jeux de navigateur casual avec puzzles, cartes, sport et défis rapides en quelques secondes.

Visiter

Mini-dramas

VSKIT Drama

Regardez des mini-séries tendance, des romances et de nouveaux short dramas avec des mises à jour rapides.

Visiter

Commentaires

5 commentaires

Rapha 💕Nov 4, 2023

This is yet another National Geographic flop. The premise is we set out on an adventure to discover the truth of HMS Erebus and HMS Terror, which went missing in the arctic circle in 1845. But we're not told this at first. Initially it seems we're looking for the lost vessels. But after a rather too long intro we discover the real search is for the remains of Captain John Franklin. This is because the "lost" ships' wrecks were discovered in 2014 and 2016, with no sign of any crew. And the grave of the captain will "undoubtedly" contain his diaries and papers and therefore reveal everything that happened. So now we are searching for the grave of a man based on a sighting of an unusual rock formation from the air, but never fear, it's only in a 30 square mile area - it's s done deal! Not so fast! The explorers get to the search area and smartly deploy a drone to photographically map the area. Unfortunately they spend the next 8 days looking and not finding anything, instead fighting mud, rocks, breakdowns and general nothingness, only to head home. Personally, I wonder if the guy got eaten by a polar bear and there are no remains.... So the end result is - nothing! 1/10.

Lidya Kedir Sep 30, 2023

source: Lost in the Arctic

Valina vertueSep 30, 2023

Was great to see such beautiful footage and exploration on the island. But it was melodramatic. And the idea that the entire mystery will be solved by finding the "tomb" doesn't seem plausible. Many survived well after Franklin died (years?) so the tomb could not possibly reveal everything that happened. It could only ever be part of the story. Yet Gross says at the end "we find one thing, we have it all". Just seems like everything is pinned on finding this mythical 'tomb' which will conveniently solve everything. It doesn't seem realistic and doesnt reflect the wide range of evidence that is out there to be recovered, including on the two ships, Inuit testimony etc. And wouldn't the ship's log be passed to Fitzjames rather than buried with Franklin? Diaries maybe but I doubt burying the log was protocol? But the filmmakers just repeat this stuff seemingly without considering these basic questions. It is odd the film is so singularly focused on this all too convenient catch-all holy grail and it just comes across as naïve click-bait filmmaking.

boxer143Sep 30, 2023

This special-ostensibly about the discovery of the grave of Arctic explorer John Franklin, of the ill-fated Erebus expedition-ends up being nothing but footage of guys sailing a boat and getting their ATVs stuck in mud. One guy goes on and on about a long-ago flight on which he saw rocks that are certain to mark Franklin's grave, which is certain to contain log books (and even photographs) that will solve mysteries. But they find NOTHING new, and the whole show consists of footage that should have been a five-minute prelude to the story they expected to tell. Worst of all, they pat themselves on the back for how their quest for answers is nobly honoring the expedition victims, while also exploiting those victims by showing explicit footage of the thawing and examination of three corpses from graves (not Franklin's) previously discovered on a different trek. The only value is that you get to see the actual terrain in places where the expedition members may have trod, but it's totally irrelevant to the Erebus story since the sun is blazing and the boggy ground is thawed to the point of soupiness.

FrancineSep 30, 2023

Both trailer and the beginning of the production gives a feeling that something has been discovered, the reality is, It's a documentary of unsuccessful expedition. All with respect It's a great adventure and I would love to be part of, but necessarily deserves to be a good or a documentary. It could be a better production if it was produced and advertised as "following Franklin..." story, following the same route, visits the same sites etc. But until the very last minute Mark says "almost there, we're close erc" like in a very low quality TV series. The thing is, the people watch this kind of documentaries won't buy this technics. Finally, sorry guys, great effort and very difficult expedition, I really respect, but the movie/production story is a failure.

Lost in the Arctic

Casting

Bande-annonce

Vous aimerez aussi