Title Dossierहॉरर

Intersect

हॉररविज्ञान-फाईथ्रिलर

मिस्कैटोनिक विश्वविद्यालय के युवा वैज्ञानिकों का एक समूह एक टाइम मशीन बनाते हैं, हालांकि उन्हें जल्द ही पता चलता है कि दूसरे आयाम से रहस्यमय, अनदेखी ताकतें उन्हें नियंत्रित कर रहे हैं.

वर्ष

2020

अवधि

1h 59m

IMDb

3.5

अभी देखें

Poster Feed

कलाकार

James Morrison

Bill Marshall

Richard Dawkins

Q42

Richard Dawkins

Computer

कलाकार

James Morrison

Bill Marshall

Richard Dawkins

Q42

Richard Dawkins

Computer

Jason Spisak

Ryan Winrich

Abe Ruthless

Nate Beaumont

LD

Leeann Dearing

Caitlin Webb

Jose Rosete

Abner Rosen

DD

Dartagnan Driscoll

Young Ryan

KB

Kelcey Bligh

Young Caitlin

RA

Ryan Adelson

Young Nate

Jacob Lacy

Young Abner

Michaela Dean

Emma

FA

Frank Aaron

Detective

JB

J. Benton

Onlooker

Garrett Boyd

Geoffrey

JD

Joe DiGiovanni

Bully

SH

Slade Hall

Larry Fincher

Lawrence Krauss

Professor

ट्रेलर

आपको ये भी पसंद आ सकते हैं

Featured Picks

और entertainment चाहिए? हमारे recommended gaming hub और short-drama destination को explore करें।

Instant Games

Gamixo

Puzzles, cards, sports और quick challenges वाले casual browser games कुछ ही सेकंड में खेलें।

Short Drama

VSKIT Drama

Trending mini-series, romance stories और नए short dramas को fast daily updates के साथ देखें।

टिप्पणियाँ

10 टिप्पणियाँ

Paluuu🇱🇸🇱🇸May 29, 2023

source: Intersect

Mafu GuambeNov 22, 2022

This is no doubt the worst movie of all times, the plot, the dialogues, the poor acting, the extremly boring timeline. I have nothing against low budget movies with poor effects, casting and technical struggles. The problem here is that almost every line in this movie is a parody of itself. Feels like it was made by a 10 year old. Ive paid to see it on iTunes, it felt better getting robbed by a pocket thief 20 years ago when I was a student and really needed the money. Ps: all the reviews over 2 out of ten are fake, new accounts with only 1 review. Watch it if you want to be amazed by how a bad a movie can be, but please don't pay for it like I did, you'll be sorry.

cv 💣💥 mareim Mar5 ❤🇲🇷🇲Nov 22, 2022

Any time a writer tries to tackle time travel it's a sticky situation.. and this movie actually does a pretty good job of handling time/dimensional travel... so it's with great disappointment that the entire rest of the storyline and execution are so bad. I mean, really bad. An endless string of non-sequitur events, bad CGI "aliens", and an unexplainable ending. They could have focused SO much more on the development of the time machine, the alien influence, the aftermath, instead of things like school bullies, love interests, and dinner outings. Ah well, better luck next time

mr__aatuNov 22, 2022

I'm almost disappointed. Based on some of these reviews, I was expecting a new cinematic low, but Intersect never got there. Commenters claiming the acting is wooden or dull probably didn't watch the movie. If anything, the actors are a little emotive and melodramatic at times. All in all, though, i thought Intersect was good. It was interesting and held my attention and I was entertained...and that's basically what I look for in a movie.

Sajid UmarNov 22, 2022

The film has some good ideas behind it and the special effects are good, but !!! saying that.. the acting is atrocious and the makeup of the actors is tragic. The background cast behaviour overall is not of a scientist, you can tell they are struggling to perform their role. Like I stated in the title worth a watch, its not the worst out there, but its more like a Sci-Fi channel premiere ..

Pariss 🧜🏽‍♀️Nov 22, 2022

When you watch a movie there are many things we take for granted until you experience something this bad. The premise for the movie is the only reason I have it two stars and the fact that I was able to get though it without turning it off. But, in the interest of full disclosure I did get on the computer during the last 30 minutes to look up a camera lens... Bad acting Story did not develop well Ending was obviously an afterthought There were times in the sequence of events where you couldn't really gauge the period because they did not differentiate the actors well enough. It was just bad.

user7580536149852Nov 22, 2022

...Which is the ONLY reason to watch this disappointing wallpaper of a movie! I can only imagine that he just provided audio clips for his role as the voice of the computer system, little realising that his part would be the outstanding performance of the whole movie. Without being disrespectful of the good professor, I have to say that this elevated position in the cast is almost entirely due to the rest of the cast, they being either entirely wooden or entirely "Over the top" in their emotional performances, while Dr Dawkins, calm measured voice reminds us that the rest of the cast are either engaging in "Recreational substances" or coming down from using them! It is my habit to continue watching bad movies until they end, so as to present a rounded view of what was presented. In this case, I lasted one hour into the dreadfully slow progress of the script. At that point, I felt like it had been several hours! I, therefore, took the unusual step (For me) in abandoning the mission. So I'll never find out what happened to the characters. And, the key point is, I didn't care about any of them*! * Well I hope the computer survived! 🙂

Aboubakar SiddickNov 22, 2022

It's true. I hated the character "Nate" played by talentless abe ruthless, so much that i actually laughed and cheered when he was liquified

선미 SUNMINov 22, 2022

Totally agree with karrijunttila - what a really bad movie!

EL houssne mohamed 🇲🇷Nov 22, 2022

And boy was I bored to death... Good filming, most of the main actors acted well, but I never saw such dramatization since Bollywood soap opera. The fact that the story is told backwards doesn't help at all. CGI were pretty ok, but the director wanted to make movie AND art at the same time and of course failed like many others. It takes time to make a good movie and tons of experience to make art. This one failed at both.