Title DossierBiography

Mary Queen of Scots

Biographyड्रामाइतिहास

मैरी स्टुअर्ट के, अपनी कज़िन इंग्लैंड की रानी एलिजाबेथ वन को ओवरथ्रो करने के प्रयास और सजा का सामना करने से पहले वर्षों की कैद को दर्शाया गया है.

वर्ष

2018

अवधि

2h 4m

IMDb

6.3

अभी देखें

Poster Feed

कलाकार

Saoirse Ronan

Mary Stuart

Margot Robbie

Queen Elizabeth I

Jack Lowden

Henry Darnley

कलाकार

Saoirse Ronan

Mary Stuart

Margot Robbie

Queen Elizabeth I

Jack Lowden

Henry Darnley

Angela Bain

Snuffer Woman

Richard Cant

Thomas Andrews

GR

Guy Rhys

Earl of Kent

Thom Petty

Earl of Shrewsbury

Izuka Hoyle

Mary Seton

JR

John Ramm

Bull

Simon Russell Beale

Robert Beale

AC

Abby Cassidy

Fotheringhay Gentlewoman

SJ

Shalisha James-Davis

Fotheringhay Gentlewoman

Maria Dragus

Mary Fleming

Eileen O'Higgins

Mary Beaton

Liah O'Prey

Mary Livingston

Greg Miller Burns

Thomas Hepburn

Aneurin Pascoe

John Hepburn

Adrian Derrick-Palmer

George Dalgleish

ट्रेलर

Featured Picks

और entertainment चाहिए? हमारे recommended gaming hub और short-drama destination को explore करें।

Instant Games

Gamixo

Puzzles, cards, sports और quick challenges वाले casual browser games कुछ ही सेकंड में खेलें।

Short Drama

VSKIT Drama

Trending mini-series, romance stories और नए short dramas को fast daily updates के साथ देखें।

टिप्पणियाँ

10 टिप्पणियाँ

Puja karki 😊Mar 13, 2026

Shezzowicked03Mar 3, 2025

.

CookieOct 18, 2024

🩷

nadianakaiMay 27, 2024

What's worse, inaccurate dialog/accents or PC casting gone OUT OF CONTROL in a historical drama? I don't know but who gave this woman a chance to direct this story?? Why? These people were white, deal with it, that's life. The theater background of the director is also painfully obvious at points in the performances; way over the top, just like stage actors would do. I guess she thought the audience wouldn't be able to hear the actors (she forgot about the big shotgun mic!) One star. 0 if I could. Don't even bother on Netflix.

LUNA SOLOMONMay 27, 2024

This movie was a waste of time. It ignored the reality of two powerful women in favor of an invented gay drama. It reduced Mary to a girl who spent most of the movie be undressed by her servants, being sexually assaulted by men, drinking and giggling with her girls about boys and sex and worrying about marrying for love. Queen Elizabeth is made to look like the mad hater and queen of hearts from Tim Burton's version of Alice in Wonderland and spends most of the movie worrying about her appearance and her barren womb. The movie was more about the men around these women than the actual women. The script could have been better if written by a college student studying history. It was that disappointing. This movie was a waste of the location, costuming, cinematography and actors.

👑ملكة وصفات تيك توك 👑May 27, 2024

Ok I will start by stating what everyone else has already stated, this movie is a hot mess of terrible inaccuracies, and the moronic world of Hollyweird has gone too far trying to be "diverse and overly PC" Scotland in the 1500's was not full of black and Asian people! This has got to stop! Can we go back to making movies just for the sake of movie making? This is akin to making a historical black or Asian movie full of blonde white actors, which I know would cause absolute uproar but somehow this is ok because it fit Hollywood's agenda! I for one will be boycotting all movies from now on, my faith in the movie making process is gone, there is nothing more I would like to see now than for Hollywood to implode...never to be heard from again!

Simo BeyyoudhMay 27, 2024

Not a godawful movie, but close. Badly miscast: Mary with a strong Irish accent; Margot Robbie in appearance, voice, and acting not convincing as a Queen, the daughter of Henry VIII, or the force of history Elizabeth I was. The screenplay not only departs from the historical record for farcical reasons (Mary's dramatic life and death need little massaging) but introduces anachronisms ranging from gender study issues, to the incongruous casting of minorities in some virtue peddling Oscar Ceremony shoutout. Adding in, for whatever reason, a prominent but historically impossible gay/cross dressing subplot, thriving in 16th Century, John Knox-ian Holyrood Castle. Hard to follow during long stretches of promise/double cross/dastardly plots a go go/to war or not to war, and when followed intermittently interesting. I left feeling even more admiration for Shakespeare: his distillation of the complexity and violence of Scottish history in Macbeth, with nary a nod to his or our modern sensitivities of the moment, is, in the context of reviewing this movie, as of comparing Duane Allman's solo in Crossroads, to my awkward, and slow version of Pipeline by the Ventures.

mekdiyeeMay 27, 2024

If you want to watch a brilliantly acted and truthful adaption of this piece of history then look no further than the BBCs early 70s series Elizabeth R staring Glenda Jackson. I would thoroughly recommend it for younger history buffs and those who like their history factually correct.

STHEMBISO KHOZAMay 27, 2024

As much as a love watch Saorise Ronan, and she was very good in this movie, I would NOT recommend it. It was so far off from being historically correct that it isn't even funny. The previews are NOT what they appear the movie truly is.

Priya limbuMay 27, 2024

Just seen this seen this shameless revisionist politically correct quotathon today whilst on holiday in the States. I don't think I've ever been so angry after seeing a historical film before. I can accept the possibility that there may have been one brother in or around Elizabeth I's 16th century court but not 6,7 or 8. Then there's Mary's entourage, which has even more PC boxes ticked. Obviously the director really wanted to 'rub our noses in it' with this social justice man hating rage fest. Avoid this film if you like accurate non box ticking revisionist history.