Title Dossierड्रामा

Rubikon

ड्रामाविज्ञान-फाई

Following a catastrophe on Earth, the planet is covered in a toxic fog. The crew in the space station, must decide whether to risk their lives to get home and search for survivors, or stay safe in the station's "algae symbiosis system".

वर्ष

2022

अवधि

1h 50m

IMDb

5.0

अभी देखें

Poster Feed

कलाकार

ML

Magdalena Lauritsch

Director

Julia Franz Richter

Hannah Wagner

George Blagden

Gavin Abbott

कलाकार

ML

Magdalena Lauritsch

Director

Julia Franz Richter

Hannah Wagner

George Blagden

Gavin Abbott

Mark Ivanir

Dimitri Krylow

Nicholas Monu

Philipp Jenson

DK

Daniela Kong

Tracy Sato

Konstantin Frolov

Danilo Krylow

HR

Hannah Rang

Knopf

LG

Ljubisa Gruicic

Sergio

JG

Jonas Gerzabek

Little Knopf

SC

Stephanie Cannon

Esther

BK

Bevin Kina Knappitsch

Child on Earth

Ljubisa Grujcic

Sergio

Jessica Lind

Writer

ML

Magdalena Lauritsch

Writer

ES

Elisabeth Schmied

Writer

ट्रेलर

आपको ये भी पसंद आ सकते हैं

ड्रामा★ 5.0

Rubikon

ड्रामा★ 4.2

Teleios

ड्रामा★ 5.3

Terminus

ड्रामा★ 2.9

Offworld: Alien Planet

ड्रामा★ 8.5

Secrets

ड्रामा★ 7.6

Foundation

ड्रामा★ 7.1

Raising Dion

ड्रामा★ 6.2

Earth Abides

ड्रामा★ 7.9

Humans

ड्रामा★ 6.5

Debris

ड्रामा★ 6.4

Falling Water

अपराध★ 6.7

All the Queen's Men

एक्शन★ 8.0

The Rookie

ड्रामा★ 3.9

4400

ड्रामा★ 7.9

प्लूरिबस

ड्रामा★ 6.1

I Am Frankie

ड्रामा★ 7.3

Better Than Us

ड्रामा★ 7.4

Tales from the Loop

ड्रामा★ 4.6

Genesis

ड्रामा★ 6.8

Do No Harm

ड्रामा★ 7.1

Sora wo Kakeru Yodaka

ड्रामा★ 5.1

Leila

ड्रामा★ 6.6

The First

ड्रामा★ 7.6

Star City

Featured Picks

और entertainment चाहिए? हमारे recommended gaming hub और short-drama destination को explore करें।

Instant Games

Gamixo

Puzzles, cards, sports और quick challenges वाले casual browser games कुछ ही सेकंड में खेलें।

Short Drama

VSKIT Drama

Trending mini-series, romance stories और नए short dramas को fast daily updates के साथ देखें।

टिप्पणियाँ

10 टिप्पणियाँ

Erly Brialdia Okomo Jul 18, 2024

eijayfrimpongJul 16, 2024

Kamogelo Mphela 🎭Jul 16, 2024

EmmaMay 29, 2023

source: Rubikon

lillyafeMay 23, 2023

If you can suspend your belief in reality and watch people in space breathing because of a special technology that also negates pressure AND have a desire for a terrible story line with many dead ends and unexplained situations, then this is your movie!

LarrywheelsMay 23, 2023

So I'd actually rate this about a 5.5. I'm just giving it a 10 to offset the moronic 1 star reviews. I don't know what people expected. If it's not balls to the wall action for an hour straight, then it's automatically considered trash. That's what's wrong with our society, always needing intense stimulation, can't sit still and just take in a story. It wasn't mind blowing by any means, but it was entertaining enough. There really aren't many great movies these days anyway.

Lindiwe Veronica BokMay 23, 2023

Rubikon is a very captivating movie that caught (at least) me by surprise, like "Quiet Earth", back in the 80s. The pacing is a bit slow, but doesn't steal your time. The acting (especially Julia F. Richter, you may have never heard from her before) is great. Directing, camera, cut, all decent. Setting and special effects are on par with a-list productions (where today CGI is often looking great, regardless of the budget). Storywise, you may know what you get from the trailer. Earth is suddenly devastated by the appearance of a toxic cloud, and there is a conflict on the station about going down to save survivors, or staying. Of course, this is not a space opera, there is no shooting and only very small amounts of fighting. It is a three-person- chamber drama that explores a possible future, and how a few survivors would come through. This is all laid out very convincing and atmospheric. Of course it is not perfect, there are some strange moments or reactions, one may not understand at first´and a few inconsistencies. But it all plays out. People who criticize acting and direction have to consider that this is a European production and therefore different in tone and expression from North American ones. I clearly give it 8 points. People who criticize acting and direction have to consider that this is a European production and therefore different in tone and expression from North American ones. I clearly give it 8 points.

Ahmed Salah FarahatMay 23, 2023

Big budget ....big mess. Tried to get into it...but kept getting disappointed. Felt like the whole movie was being forced to produce something that was never there. Just bad.

Congolaise🇨🇩🇨🇩❤️May 23, 2023

On first hearing the plot and storyline I had high hopes for this one but it really doesn't stand any type of scrutiny at all ! Yes, I realise you have to suspend any tendencies to disbelieve but there has to be some level of accuracy otherwise it's just nonsense, this had an excess of nonsense ! If you are writing a story that relies on physics then you really need to understand the physics involved, it's no good hoping people won't know any better ! As for entertainment value well this is just a misery fest for the sake of it and every attempt by the victims to rescue the situation fails for no clear reasons ! In the beginning there is a navigation issue with no explanation which gets ignored, then there is the main atmospheric issue which again gets no clear explanation. Then there are technical issues that can't be properly accounted for and of course the old element of 'human error' despite the fact that astronauts are carefully selected to avoid these issues ! Wooden acting, lousy dialogue, all the actors seemed to either hate each other or hate what they were doing ! There is so much wrong with this, it's just a mess and leaves you with the distinct feeling that they had nothing better to do and a huge budget weighing them down so they just made it up as they went along ! Garbage !

TiakomundalaMay 23, 2023

Where would they get O2 from? Anyone with an IQ above 80 write? Sadly not! Obviously they will have to leave! Silly story! You know how many plants - trees it would take to create enough O2?